Archives for posts with tag: meaning of stories

When the U.S. FedBizOpps (Federal Business Opportunities) Web site advertises a workshop entitled, “Analysis and Decomposition of Narratives in Security Contexts”, it’s time to face up to the shadow side of storytelling. Since the workshop took place February 28, 2011, I figure the workshop URL may disappear any time. So let me assure you that even if the link is broken when you click on it, this workshop is for real.

The full title was “Stories, Neuroscience and Experimental Technologies (STORyNET): Analysis and Decomposition of Narratives in Security Contexts.” The hosting agency was the Defense Sciences Office (DSO) of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Here’s the description:

This workshop is intended as a precursor to exploring the neurobiological mechanisms which undergird narrative processing so as to establish fertile ground for connecting our understanding of the neuropsychology of stories with models, simulations and sensors salient to security concerns. To this end, the workshop will focus on surveying theories of narrative, understanding what role they play in security domains, and establishing the state of the art in story analysis and decomposition frameworks.

If you remember Orwell’s 1984, you may recognize an unnerving similarity to the Ministry of Truth and its Fiction Department. One of the first things the novel’s government had to do was normalize a new language. Newspeak turned ordinary stories on their head.

Wandering through the DARPA Web site, where war is normalized as nothing more alarming than business strategizing, I got to thinking about George W. Bush on “weapons of mass destruction”, Sarah Palin putting cross hairs on the districts of pro-health care reform Democrats or the Harper government’s decision to scrap the long-form census because it was “coercive and intrusive”.

What all three examples have in common is a defective story with serious ramifications. Soldiers and civilians continue to die in Iraq. Palin supports powerful forces working to keep Americans from having universal health care. The Harper government’s decision to scrap the longer census means there will be inadequate information on which to base policy and funding decisions. When questioned about their actions, Bush, Palin and Harper all created new stories to explain how right they were.

George Orwell explained how it works in his appendix to 1984, “Principles of Newspeak”:

When Oldspeak had been once and for all superseded, the last link with the past would have been severed. History had already been rewritten, but fragments of the literature of the past survived here and there, imperfectly censored, and so long as one retained one’s knowledge of Oldspeak it was possible to read them. In the future such fragments, even if they chanced to survive, would be unintelligible and untranslatable.

I believe in the power of story but acknowledge its knife cuts both ways. We owe it to our children and to the seventh generation to avoid Newspeak, to tell stories that shed light, that inform, that inspire and that, ultimately, lead to a better world.

Share

This piece first appeared in October 2010 as a guest post on Mary L. Tabor’s blog, Sex After Sixty. Mary is one of the most literate, eloquent writers I’ve come across. Her posts, and those of her guests, are consistently stimulating and thought provoking.

“The places I am hurt most mark the places I am least tolerant, most vicious. Where I have been gravely injured and am most healed, these form the scant geography of my wisdom. Where I have never been hurt at all, where I have never lacked for resource or nurture, these are the stories I find it most difficult to perceive.” ~ Joanne Arnott, “Storytelling: A Constellation” in By, For & About Women


Writing truth

The dear friend who sent me this quote years ago knew my story. I was a bird with broken wings when she and her spouse took me in. They gave me a resting place until I could fly on my own again.

The words came back to me as I read Mary L. Tabor’s literate, eloquent, and painful memoir, Sex After Sixty. There were times I was holding my breath, shrinking from the next revelation.

I know why. Mary has worked through her pain, resolved her confusion, and risen like the Phoenix. But while she was writing the blog that became a book, she was still in the middle of it. The rawness of her journey made me look into the sore places in my heart. In spite of the passage of years, I still have stories I am not ready to lift out of the journals and letters where they lie like ogres ready to eat my soul.

So it did not surprise me to learn that one of Mary’s readers reacted with alarm to something she read in Sex After Sixty. No one can write that honestly and not rake fingernails over someone’s soul wounds or deepest fears. When a reader recoils because the door to her spiritual closet has been flung open, the monsters released, the writer can’t help but feel responsible.

Daggers to another’s soul

During my years as a traveling storyteller, I occasionally knew I’d hit the explosion button in someone. (Others likely just smoldered quietly.) Sometimes the story that triggered the response was so innocuous I was completely flummoxed by the strong reaction. Other times, I knew the story might be difficult for some but hoped my telling would lead them to safety.

Early in my storytelling career, one story exploded in my face. It was the true account of a child who was the butt of teasing. I thought I had dealt with my own complicated reaction to her plight. So I launched the new work with a group I figured would be receptive to a story that dealt with difficult matter.

Cathryn Wellner

I could feel the atmosphere in the room change

I could feel the atmosphere change as the story unfolded. By the time I finished, the temperature in the room had changed from warm to frosty. Though the stories that followed were among my sure-fire audience pleasers, they might as well have been blocks of ice. They did nothing to thaw the room.

I’d experienced the gamut of responses to more challenging stories but never this kind of sudden freeze. Fortunately, a friend was in the audience. We had coffee together the next day. As I poured out my distress, she gently asked questions that helped me see that particular story was one that triggered emotions in me I hadn’t fully processed. I had told it too soon. The audience felt my discomfort, and it set off their own.

The experience taught me an important lesson about doing my own inner work on a story before sharing it with an audience. Most people are too polite to walk out when a story jars them. But a told story is not a book they can close or throw across the room. They are held captive.

Going public with pain

So it was with that painful lesson in mind that I was horrified when, years later, one of my storytelling students invited me to a one-woman show. She was inviting everyone she knew to hear the story of her years of being sexually abused by her father. She had rented a hall and baked cookies.

I was mortified but could think of no gentle way of refusing to come. She wanted me there, wanted me to see what she had done with what she had learned in the workshops. I wondered if she had been absent when I talked about the importance of not using the audience as a crying towel.

The hall was packed with her friends. She set the scene and began to spin a story of survival and triumph so magical I still get shivers when I think about it. She was no longer a victim. She carried no guilt. She was a strong, beautiful woman who had experienced the horrors of degradation but emerged whole and healthy. When the last words of her performance died away, the audience rose spontaneously in a standing ovation.

We cannot control others’ responses

Most of my own challenging experiences, and those of colleagues, have not had such straightforward causes and effects. A colleague was telling a story to a group of school children when one little girl burst into tears. The death of a parent in an old folktale sent the child into spasms of grief. The storyteller decided to retire that particular story from her repertoire.

Some time after the incident, my friend learned the child’s mother had died only months before. Her father had never talked with his daughter about their loss. Instead, he had walled off his emotions and tried to give her a normal childhood.

The child felt she had to protect her father from her own sorrow so never mentioned her mother—until the story ripped off her protective scarring. The teacher who called my friend had spoken with the father and learned the story had been a key. Father and daughter used it to unlock and share their grief.

The truth is, beyond setting our own internal house in order and trying to act responsibly, we cannot control the impact our stories have, whether they or written or told.

An opportunity to reflect

I remember telling a story to a group of American middle school students on a military base in Germany. It was clear they were on the edge of out-of-control when they walked in the room. With young people this age, a storyteller has less than five minutes to captivate or lose them. If they’re not captivated, they will make the next hour feel like a year, a very tortured, painful year.

So I told them the story of Tayzanne, a haunting story that never failed to calm the antsiest group. I did not tell it because I loved the story, though I did and still do. I wielded it like a club, hoping to bludgeon them into submission. [The whole episode can be read in “Bite till the blood runs”.

It worked. They were still and attentive and actually seemed sorry when the hour ended. I didn’t know until a year later how much the story had unsettled them. When I returned to the school, they wanted to hear the story again. It was the only story they wanted to hear. We spent the entire time exploring its mysteries together, examining their questions like precious jewels.

When our best efforts are rejected

For the most part, storytellers and writers are not offered the luxury of exploring together whatever it is that unsettles our listeners or readers. Critics can trash us. Audiences can turn away. They can send angry letters or make distressed phone calls. They do not owe us any deep, honest exploration of what it was that prompted their dismay.

When Mary shared one reader’s troubling response to her eloquent book, I wrote back: “The woman may not be able to articulate what scared her so much that she had to run away screaming. Perhaps she’s not yet healed from some relationship or is involved in one that’s on shaky grounds. Maybe she’s held captive by religious teachings she is afraid to question, in case the answers might crumble her world.

“Whatever the case, she’s taken her own anxieties and projected them onto you, in a way that triggers the deepest fear in any writer – that what we have to say is unworthy and that perhaps that means we are unworthy. That you’ve had so much positive response to your splendid book gets placed on one side of the balance. On the other side is the heavy stone of her reaction. No one’s immune from the bashing that does to the spirit, even someone as accomplished, talented, open, and intelligent as you.”

Wisdom from one who came before

In her 1938 book, If You Want to Write: A Book about Art, Independence and Spirit, Barbara Ueland wrote, “I think that when people condemn what we do, they are symbolically destroying us. Hence the excruciatingly painful feeling, though to our common sense it seems foolish and self-centered to feel so badly.”

When we release our story children, the products of our creative imaginations, into the world, we become sensitive plants, recoiling from unkind touch. It is then we need the words of Barbara Ueland:

“What comes truly from me is true, whether anybody believes it or not. It is my truth.”

Share

My friend was adamant. “There are no rats in my neighborhood!”

I’d stopped by for a visit to a lovely home in a decidedly upper-middle-class area of Seattle. On my way up to the door, I spied a big, grey rat scurrying among the garden plants. Since rats are ubiquitous, I didn’t find anything unusual about it.

The friend I was visiting was offended when I mentioned the rat. Not her fault really. Rats have a bad reputation. When we think of rats in western cultures, we think of stories such as

  • rats spreading plague in the dark days of the Black Plague
  • the Pied Piper ridding Hamelin of rats by piping an enchanting tune
  • scenes in horror films where hundreds of rats attack a bound victim
  • rats stowing on board ships
  • expressions such as “rat-faced”, “I smell a rat”, “rat on someone”, “dirty rat”

Rats are intelligent, social creatures. They don’t deserve their bad reputation. They need a new story that will rehabilitate their image. Maybe something that will make labs think twice about inflicting pain. A story that will bring respect to these much-maligned rodents.

And here it is. Bart Weetjens admires rats. He knows there are some things they do better than humans, like recognize odors. So he trained them and put them to work sniffing out land mines and tuberculosis. Turns out they trump humans and our machines many times over on both those tasks. And they ask little in return.

This TED video is twelve minutes long. Watch this, and you’ll have a new story about rats, a story that will make you look at them with respect.

This is important because so many of the stereotypes and misconceptions that divide us as people, that rip apart organizations and shatter families and plunge us into wars, are really a function of unhealthy, inaccurate, or incomplete stories. I’m not saying that telling a new story about rats would convince the fleas who feed on them not to spread diseases from rats to humans. I’m not naive enough to claim that if we all knew the stories of Osama bin Laden, Margaret Thatcher, Gandhi, and our next door neighbour, we’d usher in peace on earth.

But I do believe we’d be more careful with each other, our fellow creatures, and our planet if we acknowledged that our stories are always like the ones the blind men told about the elephant—predicated on our partial knowledge of any topic we broach.

Share

This little video from Brian Andreas is a good reminder that we constantly edit our lives. So we might as well edit them in a way that gives us joy and a sense of accomplishment and possibility. Otherwise we’re just dragging around a heavy bag of regret, shame, guilt, disappointment, and all those other stones that invariably drop into our lives.

The editing is a daily event. Something happens. We tell friends about it. Some parts of the story work. Others fall flat. Unless we’re completely oblivious to the reactions of others, we make mental notes of what worked and what didn’t, where people’s eyebrows furrowed in confusion, when they lost interest, and the times they were leaning forward as if they were gobbling every word we uttered.

Next time we pull out that story, we spin a version influenced by the first telling…or the first ten tellings. Eventually we settle into a version we’re happy with.

At that point additional edits are only slight tailorings for specific audiences. The story line and chosen details remain pretty much the same, and we carry that story around just waiting for an opportunity to share it.

Of course, some stories stop working for us. We move on, choose a new way of looking at our life, forgive our nemesis. So we drop the story from our repertoire or subject it to major revisions.

Ivan Doig turns it around in a way that delights me in Ride with Me, Mariah Montana. He writes: “Memories are stories our lives tell us.”

Of course, stories do more than help us figure out who we are at any given time. They also create—or divide—community. Harold Rosen once wrote:

It is an interesting feature of personal storytelling that it usually sets in motion a sequence of stories. Tell a hospital story and you will provoke others, just as jokes beget jokes. If you analyse a sequence of this kind you will almost always discover that, far from being a random collection, they constitute an endeavor to reach a collective understanding of some important theme like fear, courage, loss of eccentricity. ~ Harold Rosen, “Stories At Work”

That makes the stories we tell even more important. We live them, exchange them, and try to pair them with other stories in a never-ending dance. And how we tell them makes a difference, in our own lives, to our families and friends, and to the larger community.

Share

Events in the U.S. and Canada are making me think about the upcoming Reinvention Summit Michael Margolis is masterminding. From November 11 to 22 over thirty storytelling visionaries will be gathering around the electronic fire, to share their insights and spark discussion.

The summit seems particularly timely to me since two major streams of reinvention stories have been kicked off in the last twenty-four hours. How these stories are crafted and played out will have significant impact in the coming months.

Before I went to bed on November 2nd, the U.S. Democrats and President Obama were already starting to create a new story. Having retained control of the Senate but lost the House, they were beginning to shape a story that could move beyond the heady optimism of the 2008 election without losing sight of the promised changes that swept them into office.

The Tea Party was already spinning stories that made their relatively poor showing sound like a major coup. And, of course, the Republicans were crowing about their takeover of the House and conveniently ignoring the Tea Party dissidents as they carved out a story about how they were going to put the brakes on every forward-thinking program that has managed to get past their heel-dragging in the past two years.

In Canada November 3rd started with another reinvention story in the making. The Premier of British Columbia, Gordon Campbell, suddenly announced he was resigning. He’s now in his third term, with an approval rating that has sunk to 9%. He dropped hints in his speech about how he’s going to edit the story of his years in the top spot in our province.

What was particularly interesting to me was listening to both his supporters and his opposition. The stories from his supporters were predictably laudatory but showed carefully crafted and shared briefing notes. By the third or fourth supporter, I knew almost word for word what they were going to say, thanks to the story editors in the Liberal Party inner sanctum.

Believe Me

Download this storytelling manifesto to learn more about 15 storytelling axioms

On the other hand, some of his opponents, taken by surprise at the Premier’s resignation, were telling stories that were polar opposites of the ones they’d been telling during the years of Campbell’s tight control and the months of anti-HST campaigning. (For those not in BC or Canada, we’ve recently been slapped with a Harmonized Sales Tax of 12%. Depending on which stories you believe, it’s either a heinous attack on our pocketbooks or a smart approach that will bring business to the province.) I was relieved when one opponent refused to gloss over the gutting of the civil service or the privatization of so many things that were delivered into corporate hands.

In both the U.S. and Canada, there’ll be a lot of story rewrites in the coming weeks. So this is a particularly good time to jump into the Reinvention Summit and engage in some vigorous discussion about the role of stories, why they are so powerful, and what it all means for us, as story-making creatures.

Registration starts as low as $11.11. You can tune in during the scheduled times or download the broadcasts for later listening. With so many thoughtful speakers lined up, the summit will have no trouble supporting the statement, “If you want to change the world, change your story.”

Share
Cathryn playing ukelin

Cathryn with ukelin, instrument from the thirties

There was a time when my ex and I took the stage as part of the cowboy poetry scene. For him, it was a dream come true. For me, it was fingernails on a blackboard. Not for the other poets we listened to, whose work came from a deep place, but for me. I was always a reluctant farmer and rancher. The inequity between outflow and inflow of cash gave me high blood pressure for the first time in my life.

Our colleagues on the circuit were completely smitten by the life. I was a reluctant participant.

Even a reluctant rancher cannot help but understand the role of cowboy poetry. The poems are stories of the land, of the life, of tragedy and joy, of comedy and pain, and, ultimately, of the meaning of life. On the British Columbia circuit, rhyming was preferred but not required. Cattle and horses were royal subjects. Sheep were an embarrassment.

Prince George cowboy poetry festival

Some of the "real" cowboy poets at the Prince George, BC, festival

I had always been in the camp that derided country music and cowboy poetry. I believed the mockery that if you played country music (and, for me, cowboy poetry) backward you got your wife back, your truck back, your dog back, etc.

My brief experience on the cowboy poetry circuit taught me how wrong I was. There was nothing cynical or shallow about the poems I heard. There was celebration of the land, the people, the animals. There was agony over weather, death, injury, illness, and financial losses.

The poems were stories. They were literate, elegiac, funny, mournful, celebratory. They were stories of a way of life that works its way deep into the soul.

Pioneer Ranch

Pioneer Ranch, my home for nine years

My ex and I had both sheep and cattle. I never bonded with the cows. I adored the sheep. Still, I’m grateful for all of it—the times when all plans were halted because we had to tend to a cow, sheep or pig in difficult labour, the hours spent stretching wire for new fences, the endless rounds on a tractor as we cut, baled, and brought in the hay, the magic of Northern Lights, the wary trust of wildlife.

So in that spirit, I share with you a song we recorded on “The Bull Rider’s Wife”, with thanks to talented lyricist Fred J. Eaglesmith. The song is a story, and the story still squeezes my heart.

13 Summerlea

Share

Computer graphics are so sophisticated these days it’s hard to know what’s real and what’s fake. These two videos are clearly in the latter category. No one watching them would believe a squirrel can play hacky sack or a penguin become a table tennis whiz.

The ads are no less fun for that. Both tell stories. Both are engaging. Whether or not they are effective in selling beer is something only Carlsberg knows. The first video shows the two ads. The second shows us how the animators created the squirrel ad.

Our digital world puts the story making in the hands of anyone who can afford a computer, a camera, and editing software. I celebrate that because I believe in the power and importance of creativity.

Story making is in our DNA. We can contribute our unique perspectives without needing a stamp of approval, a publisher, a film or recording studio, or a contract.

Where the issue becomes dicey is where the truth of what we’re seeing counts. Consider health claims on processed foods, safety assurances by chemical companies, and promises from politicians.

Documents can be manipulated. Photographs can be cleverly edited. Sound recordings can be pieced together from clips to make someone say something entirely fictional. Research can be skewed.

I do my best not to add to the confusion. A friend has asked me repeatedly why I insist on tracking down the truth of a story before posting it on my blogs. “You’re a storyteller,” she says. “Why does it matter, if it’s a good story?”

That’s a good question. It matters to me because I get tired of the emotion-manipulating stories that prove to be false. I love fiction and appreciate the craft involved in creating a world that is believable from the first paragraph to the final page. But I don’t appreciate being hoodwinked, and I know that much of what comes to me in print or digital form intends to do just that.

I love the stories I find and that people send for my blogs, and I always check them out before posting them. I cannot give an iron-clad guarantee they are true, but I can guarantee I have done enough sleuthing to have confidence in them.

They express points of view. Everything does, even the most “objective” news report or scientific research or courtroom testimony. But they do not intentionally add to the web of deceit that keeps us from making truly informed decisions.

Share

It’s been two decades since I copied the quotation below from Jim Nollman’s book, Spiritual Ecology. At the time I wrote it down, I substituted “storyteller” for “artist”.

I was prompted by the question so many children asked when I told stories in schools, “Is that true?” I finally settled on this answer: “All of my stories are true, but not everything in my stories happened.”

That always seemed to satisfy the young questioners. They grasped intuitively what adults often seem to forget, that we can find truth in a dance, a painting, a story, a poem. It’s not a truth that can be counted, nor an experience that is suited to experimental processes.

But then, frankly, neither is the physical world scientists subject to measurements. Scientific research starts with a hypothesis, which is, in a sense, a story about the way some substance or process or creature or interaction is expected to behave. Stories start the same way, with speculation about the way people will behave.

Both are influenced by the life experience of the observer, whether scientist or storyteller. Both are subject to the surprise element. Both can be turned on their head when a scientist or storyteller comes at the research or story from an entirely different perspective.

So while I still like this quote, I no longer see the worlds of the scientist and the artist as separate and distinct. Both test hypotheses. Neither can successfully separate from the larger context. Both are essential to our lives.

An artist also asks questions. But instead of utilizing rigor and skepticism to provide experiential answers that exist in a direct causal relationship to those questions, he or she focuses upon a medium that provides the experience directly. The artist works to convey a perceptual message in a manner that requires no operational definitions and no rigid rules of correspondence to expel the subjective perception of his or her own consciousness. And whereas a scientist thrives on absolute answers expressed as numbers, an artist thrives on process. A scientist seeks to expand humanity’s frame of reference; an artist seeks to expand humanity’s depth of insight. ~ Jim Nollman, Spiritual Ecology

Share

The oil spill in the Gulf is everybody’s story, but from our distant vantage points, we are not always sure how to influence it.

NASA image of oil slick

NASA image on June 26, courtesy of NASA Goddard Photo and Video's Flickr photostream

I write on Day 68 of one of the world’s most horrendous environmental disasters, with little to cheer as we watch scenes of wildlife coated in sticky goo and read stories of the psychological toll on coastal residents.

The Twitter universe is abuzz with 140-character messages. The satiric BPGlobalPR taunts the oil giant with messages purportedly from BP, such as: “Keep in mind, the more your interest in the oil spill wanes, the less damage the oil does” and “We are doing everything we can to stop the information leaks in the gulf”. Others post links to breaking news or to the reflections of dozens of bloggers.

Paul Steele decided to ask fellow Twitter users (aka Tweeps) to join him with one, simple message: “Clean the Gulf”. The video starts with the ubiquitous Twitter “fail whale”, the cartoon character who cheerfully—and frequently—sails onto the screen with the message that Twitter is “over capacity”.

Spliced between some of the most wrenching photographs of the oil spill and its aftermath, people sing their pleas or hold signs with messages such as: “Save the oceans and the animals”, “Don’t blow it. Good planets are hard to find” and “We are all complicit. We must end our fossil fuel addiction”.

Will a Twitter video reverse the damage spreading like a cancer over the Gulf? Not likely, but when a dominant story is one of such magnitude and impact, we have to find a way to deal with it. So we tell stories to put it in context, stories based on the news we see or hear, the opinions of friends, and our own experience of life.

By becoming part of this Twitter video, people from around the globe took the chance to edit at least a part of their own oil spill story. The new story they created together says more than “Clean the Gulf”. It also says, “We are in this together”. It reminds those responsible, “We are holding you accountable”.

For the participants themselves it says, “I am not powerless in the face of disaster.” And that is the only story that leads to action instead of paralysis.

Share

Artist Isa D’Arleans is originally from France but has made her home in Seattle for many years. I met her when visiting a friend there. She is vivacious, talented, and a deep pool of thought.

Recently, she started a blog, Live In Colors that explores what it means to be fully alive. She is also refreshingly candid. Recently she was interviewed by King5 TV in Seattle and spoke of a long, dry spell—how she endured it, what it meant, how she is emerging.

So when Isa asked me to write a guest post for Live In Colors, I thought about what colors meant in terms of my own storytelling and what storytelling means in terms of living fully, vibrantly, joyously.

Here’s a brief excerpt from “Stories color our lives”:

Paint Dripping

What color are your stories? (Paint Dripping, courtesy of Photos8.com)

When I’m feeling blue, I tell stories about sad times, poignant times, bring-on-a-tear times. When I’m happy I spin sunny-yellow stories about successful times, joyous times, life’s-a-bowl-of-cherries times. If I see red, I tell stories of anger, of betrayal, of how-could-you-do-it-to-me disappointment.

We all do that because storytelling is in our bones, our breath, our DNA. We are story-making animals. We figure a child has acquired language when she can string together sentences in a rudimentary narrative with a beginning, a middle, and an end.

The rest of the post can be found here.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Share